Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sea Hawk Run!'s avatar

“There was seemingly he couldn’t handle in Dean Pees’ 3-4 defense”

OMG. I found an editorial error in a Seaside Joe article! Not that I mean to pick on Mr. Joe. Just the opposite. Sometimes, Brooks misses a tackle. Sometimes, Seaside Joe makes an editorial error. But Seaside’s success rate is better by at least an order of magnitude.

Keep the content coming. Unlike the Seahawks’ defense, Seaside Joe *never* gets off the field. (My wife writes. When I told her that you’ve been writing an article a day since the Big Bang, she stopped moving, except her eyes, which became very big, and her jaw, which became very slack.)

Expand full comment
Parallax's avatar

I'd hope the Seahawks would keep Brooks. We should offer in advance of free agency, giving him an incentive to sign a reasonably priced deal because it would protect him against the possibility of severe injury. Once he hits the market, even if the Hawks have a right to match as with restricted free agents, there can be a bidding war. At this point, I'd expect him to accept a fair offer for an extension. In Brooks' case, I don't see any reason to hold back on the offer.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts