3 Comments
User's avatar
Brendan Schwartz's avatar

Good Morning ☀️. I am thinking that Riq is not going to get back to his rookie year heroics, so best to shop him if he has value, just don’t trade him for peanuts. He is capable of, but mentally is not the guy to work hard enough to get it. Seems kinda happy to be mediocre. I watched JPJ play with the Ducks and wanted us to draft him. He can’t possibly be worse than AB or CH. RG is the weakest link we have as you pointed out this week. And Riq hasn’t been great since he changed his name from Tariq.

Expand full comment
Danno's avatar
5mEdited

I’m confident Jobe is worthy of an extension because his style of play fits MM and he was cut from the Eagles before we signed him. I therefore think the cost of extending him would not be outlandish. I’m sure they are eyeing Spoon’s extension, which will be costly, as will JSN. Getting Jobe and his fit for MM at a reasonable cost will be ideal for those two. I can’t see extending Woolen because his constant lapses and penalties will not stop. Yes there is some elite play, but the snafus are far more costly than the stellar play. I’m not for trading Woolen unless it is for a RG that will fit Benton and KK and also be a noticeable improvement from Bradford.

Expand full comment
Chris H's avatar

I’m not against it if there is no intent to sign him to an extension in the offseason. We’d get a comp pick if he signed a large’ish contract elsewhere, maybe a 3rd rounder. If we can do better than that, and maybe add a player, that’d be ok.

Will the Hendrickson chatter start again with the Bengals busy Bengal’ing? Maybe. He’s signed through this year, so JS could keep to his MO of not extending a player immediately after a trade.

NO doesn’t look like a terrible team against the Bills, so maybe they aren’t that bad, and maybe the Seahawks are just that good. Just sayin’. Pittsburgh winning again, maybe they’re not so terrible either.

Expand full comment