Discussion about this post

User's avatar
zezinhom400's avatar

I think Michael Dickson as an alternate is a snub. Anger has had a great year but he gave up more absolute return yards (243 vs 210) on 17 fewer punts (44 vs 61). And at least half his games are in a dome.

Expand full comment
Paul G's avatar

I’m not a coach and unlike half the fans in social media I don’t claim to be a film maven. I can only relate what I saw when watching the defense on All-22 of the Steelers debacle:

* Riq Woolen is targeted twice in the first quarter with one completion for about five yards. Otherwise, the Steelers don’t bother throwing against him. As the game goes on, Rudolph looks in Woolen’s direction as a first option a number of times and doesn’t make a throw. Eventually, the Steelers move George Pickens to left side in the third quarter because Woolen has him blanketed. In the first quarter, Woolen plugs a hole between two blockers to make a tackle and prevent what looks would have been a breakaway. Woolen looks bad on one run that is replayed over and over on social media. In general, though, he pretty much holds his blocks on runs to the defense’s right...

*...of which there weren’t many. Pittsburgh attacked the Seahawk left almost exclusively. Rudolph picked on Mike Jackson and the ground game went right at 234-lb Devin Bush, who left at least one Steeler observer unimpressed: https://steelersdepot.com/2024/01/chris-hoke-unimpressed-by-devin-bushs-17-tackle-performance-he-had-a-lot-of-jumping-on-the-pile/

Going forward:

* Quit screwing around with Witherspoon and let him operate exclusively from the left side. We would see a lot of QBs who don’t want to throw to either the right or left of the defense. John Schneider, do your job and find someone else to play in the slot. If this means taking Brown off the field, so be it

* Get a couple of rangy thumpers at linebacker and *don’t* risk having to rely on an undersized guy for depth. Sunday, they would have been better off with Cody Barton

* Give up the fiction that Mike Jackson offers anything other than depth. Whatever his strengths (and however great a guy he might be), he is not a quality starter

My take on Bobby is that he’s likely still one of the better MLBs in the league even if not at his former HOF level. But only for two downs. He needs regular blows when what the team needs is a middle linebacker who can be out there for 99% of the defensive snaps. Reluctantly, it really is time to move on.

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts