Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Danno's avatar

I know paying K9 might not make sense, but many felt paying Kupp didn’t make sense and allowing $9 million of Kupp’s salary to guarantee last Friday happened. I think K9 is special in this running game scheme. Collinsworth was stupid to say he’s not a good receiving back. I still think he will sign with Seattle at a discount like Earnest Jones. My guess is 3 years for 30-33 million. It took K9 1/2 a season to get rolling this year and he still got 1000 yards rushing the ball. (I had him pegged at 1400+ going into the season) If they can give him a running mate RB1B to bear some of the burden and allow him to stay at 16-19 carries a game, he should stay healthy and get 1400+ yards on the ground and 500+ yards receiving. Well worth it. This will allow the Hawks to get an edge or CB at pick 32 and 64. Staying cheap at edge and CB saves more money that what K9 will cost at a discount. ($10-$11 million APY) I also think the Hawks have to acquire solid players before the draft this year given they have significantly less draft capital that in the past few years. I’m biased towards keeping players I like, so that probably colors my thinking here.

Bryant's avatar

I still think it’s crazy that $35 million a year for JSN is reasonable and maybe a steal, but $12 million a year for K9 is a reach. Similar yardage totals this past season and K9 dominated in the SB and JSN was nearly nonexistent. Great receivers come out of college at least as often as great RBs. With MM’s desire to be a run first, clock eating offense it’s odd that RBs are so easily overlooked. No offense to Holani or Charbs, but they can’t do what K9 does. The Hawks picked a 7th round RB last draft that I remembered as dominant at Oregon State and I’m not sure he even finished the season in the NFL. The whole “RBs are interchangeable” trope is silly!

30 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?