Discussion about this post

User's avatar
huevobueno's avatar

"Maybe there’s nothing to suggest that PFF watches as much football as they claim to watch." This had me chuckling. Thanks SJ!

Expand full comment
Mike McD's avatar

I believe that football analysis would be much better if they start every team at 16 rather than what they finished at the year prior.

There is so much turnover in football due to draft, free agency, injuries and coaching that just simply taking whatever a team finished the prior year is bad analysis.

I don't really care much about these rankings that everyone loves to post and talk about (fun to talk about etc. just football fodder). But I do think they would be much better if they started a team like the Seahawks at 16th ranked and then say why or why not they are 16th ranked, rather starting them at 31st ranked and claiming it is such a bold outside the box conclusion to put them at 13. To me, it is far more likely that the Hawks have the 13th best line than the 31st!

Also, we can add the Seahawks pretty bold and out of character move to try and get Fries in Free Agency. I think JS has done a complete 180 after losing Damien Lewis and his infamous comment on interior lineman. It is good to see.

Can't wait to roll the football out there on Sunday. I am really unsure how good this Niners team is. Seahawks O-line vs the Niners D-line will be a battle I want to watch closely. Could the Seahawks punch them in the mouth? Hopes are high but I have no idea. Just looking forward to it.

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts