Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephen Pitell's avatar

The Chargers at 17 looks best positioned to trade and still get my guy, who is Trevor Pennning. However, if one wants to trade down this year, it seems like we must trade down with whoever wants to trade, including 9 for 11, and then 11-14 or 11-17. We can trade down to at least 20 as long as we have options that include Ojabo or Penning.

Penning is my highest rated OT at this point, and if PC/JS have the same grade, they could take him at 9 I suppose. You cannot teach 6'7" 325lbs.

The possibilities are infinite and that makes it so intriguing.

Thanks for all the content Joe.

Expand full comment
Charles Swift's avatar

I agree with Chris. My thought is that the Seahawks will only look to trade down if the nightmare scenario occurs where all three offensive tackles (I like Cross and think he is a better zone blocker then you give him credit for), all four defensive ends and Sauce are all gone. If that occurs then the only true Blue Chippers are a safety we do not need, a center that would be an overdraft, and ILB. I just cannot get behind Stingley because of the injury history, and I agree with your earlier argument that the Seahawks won’t either. If the nightmare scenario occurs then the Seahawks best hope to go down is a team that wants to get to the front of the line on the receiver run that is going to occur between 10 and 20. If such a team exists then the Seahawks can trade back for an extra pick probably 3/4 or 2 depending on value and get a second tier prospect at edge/ corner ( unlikely) or OT at the middle end of the round. If the nightmare does not occur because a team makes reach pick for qb ( looking at you Carolina) or loves the safety (Jets - unlikely because they are going to use our 10th for a player who may well be better than Jamal next year - ouch) then we will stay where we are at and take the player that fell to us.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts