Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Seaside Joe's avatar

I had also forgotten that the Seahawks had picks 29 and 30 BACK to BACK after trading down from 21, then decided to trade back again at 30. That tells me that the Seahawks were really not impressed by the players left on the board at 21 and then again at 29, but they couldn't trade back with both picks so decided to just take their lumps with LJ Collier and keep trying to acquire more capital. Ultimately how regrettable is it to move from 21 to 29? Eh, they could have had Montez Sweat, I guess, but understandable to move him down or off of your board at the time. Then taking Collier, there weren't a lot of elite talents who ended up going after him, with Deebo as the closest premier player to go off of the board early in the second round. They could have maybe picked Jawaan Taylor, I remember that being linked at the time. Of course, Lock went 42nd, but if the Giants picked him at 6, nobody would've blinked an eye.

Expand full comment
Rusty's avatar

This is a very entertaining read. It brought back to me that all draft picks are like the school kids in A Prairie Home Companion.....all above average.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts