Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scott M's avatar

I personally wouldn't put too much stake in the intel gathered. Some might be helpful, stealing communications or being able to interpret and crack coms might serve us well. I doubt there's much Kupp could tell Hawks coaches they don't already know with regard to scheme and play design. Unless Kupp could give insight to play calling and how McVay thinks and how he tries to attack certain match ups - maybe then that might be good Intel? Plus, I might think McVay will adjust any small things that Kupp is keen to. But who knows, maybe this is just what we need to put the rams in their place. FTR!

Expand full comment
Dale's avatar

Any intel is good, but I’m not sure it makes that much difference. Good coaches develop and evolve. They change from season to season to avoid predictability and improve over time. Some things change week to week. Adjustments occur during a game. So intel from previous years is very limited. Especially when there’s coaching changes thrown in.

Yes, intel is good. But what we need more are competent players, a good, adaptable game plan and a great game manager. I think we’ve got at least two of those this season.

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts