Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Doug's avatar

Your article on Geno’s contract is the one that nails it, Ken.

The Seahawks now need help to make the playoffs and Geno has no chance at hitting his incentives.

So, a manufactured reason to start Lock is right on the money.

Expand full comment
Mike McD's avatar

Geno Smith had an mvp type performance. He out played in some regards an MVP top candidate. He led his offense to the 9th best offensive output of the year! (to that point)

He threw an interception on an incredible play from a db, a route his wr didn’t win, and he missed it inside. Look at who the top turnovers makers are at QB in the league. Turnovers hurt but aggressive turnovers should be expected and needed to play aggressive football to win.

Geno received a play called on the final play that let Micah parsons attack him unblocked with the only option a third string RB running across the formation to the flat. That is now Geno's fault?

Do we want Geno to call the plays also? Or take Shane’s calls and say no I’m not doing it?

Let’s get some fair QB analysis here ... c'mon man.

I am a lock fan but losing Geno after he played such an incredible game is such a bummer. Did he and Shane turn the corner and learn to get the ball out fast (yes that leads to int sometimes)?

I think Geno will still start because the dude is tough.

I will also be behind lock 💯 if he does go because I also think he has a great chance to be good. Also, it just increases variance of the game but may increase win chances as new QBs often have a spike at the start before the NFL catches onto their tendencies.

Go hawks

Expand full comment
45 more comments...

No posts