7 Comments
Mar 26, 2022Liked by Seaside Joe

Alright, alright, alright! Your logic makes sense. I've always believed the Hawks would (once again) trade back from #9 to accumulate more picks. But I'm never correct and they zig when I Zag (painful wink there). I'm still probably ok, as long as they don't reach for either QB, RB, S or even WR. We've got too many holes to plug with young talent.

Expand full comment
founding
Mar 26, 2022Liked by Seaside Joe

I was not following the draft the year they took Okung & Thomas, but I vaguely remember Thomas being a “reach” not sure how Okung was graded at that pick. That being caveated, if we know anything about the Seahawks it seems more than likely they will be selecting someone not being mentioned on many draft boards.

Expand full comment

Why did you did this to us? You're right on all three counts, of course. However, now the odds of Pete/John doing one of those things has increased.

I'd like you to write a colum proposing this year's Bruce Irvin. Who is the player(s) Pete/John will feel compelled to draft while all the pundits whine they were over-drafted?

Expand full comment

ridin' your wake son, you and Rob make too much sense...

Expand full comment

I like DAVIS ,a 340# NT with SPEED , CROSS a pass protector with QUICKness or SAUCE a ball-hawking 6'3" CB( you cant coach speed ).AS for #2 and #3 an option thread in Fieldgulls I liked address them)

Expand full comment