Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Danno's avatar

For me, the biggest drawback to K9 is his durability. If he plays healthy the rest of the year, and has some big time difference making explosive runs, I could see extending him, but not at a big number. You mention how many RBs are going to be free agents, that might mean the competition for jobs could drive down the price of keeping him. I love keeping players who like being here in Seattle and who work hard for the team. Walker is that type of player. I can’t see spending $8 million or even more than $6 million a year. Would he take a team friendly contract that has a low base guarantee, but has incentives for performance? I would say, look at E. Jones, we can’t pay more than someone who is there every game and playing down after down. If he can get $8 million elsewhere with all the available RBs, than let him go. Maybe he will take less and bet on himself.

Expand full comment
Rusty's avatar

I really like K9, and I’ll miss having him on the team if he’s gone next year. If he goes to a team that already has regular success with their running scheme, I expect he’ll do well.

That said, if the Hawks let him go to free agency, I’ll trust John Schneider has a plan. I just hope that plan isn’t just counting on Zach Charbonnet to light it up for 17 games. In my opinion, he’s not fast enough to be an RB1 in the NFL. He has his place, but being a bell cow isn’t it.

Expand full comment
36 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?