Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Danno's avatar

I’m thrilled we get a chance to beat the Rams again. We have Shanahan’s number, now it’s time to show McVey we have his number as well. I’d rather face the Pats. I think it will be a better opponent than facing a backup QB who hasn’t played in a year. Beating a Stidum led team would be anticlimactic.

mfwords's avatar
38mEdited

Here’s why that’s good. The Bears beat themselves tonight. And they did so multiple times, by playing scared and going for it on 4th down and failing, repeatedly. Williams is amazing, but sometimes talent makes you blind. His final INT was such an example. I don’t think Seattle operates that way. And I don’t think the Rams’ D is very good. They’re beatable and they look to have regressed rather than progressed since Seattle played them in the regular season. They’re getting leakier. If the Bears had stuck with the run and forced the Rams to defend it more consistently and taken the risk out of Williams’ game (and put him in play/run action more) they would have won. Seattle can do just that.

Here’s why it’s bad. The Rams have Stafford. And when he had to be good tonight, he was. Luckily, Seattle can get pressure with a base look, which the Bears could not and Seattle is also better in base against the run. Arguably, the Rams are healthier on offense but less healthy on defense. Stafford and Nakua are why this will be a game. It won’t be like the pasting of the 9ers. I bet odds makers say it’s close to a toss-up. You have to hope, however, for Seattle weather. The Rams have now had five more quarters of softening than the Hawks; and they’ll play this game with one fewer day of rest than Seattle. They fly home now, late, adjust on Monday with all their bumps and bruises, and have to head north just a few days later. It’s not the regular season. They want revenge, but Seattle will have every motivation, not just the SB, to prove they’re better.

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?