Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Doug's avatar

The lack of a dangerous 3rd WR has allowed opposing Ds to rotate coverage toward DK with little opportunity for him to catch passes in space.

With JSN in the mix opposing Ds will be forced to play DK more straight up, but it might take a couple of huge games by JSN for that to happen. He is more than capable!

Add a very dynamic RB room into the mix and I don’t see how this edition of the Seahawks offence is not the best we’ve seen since 2005.

Expand full comment
Village Idiot's avatar

I admit to being dubious about YAC as being a very useful descriptor. For one thing, it is a statistic, and my general skepticism thereof is (by now) well established.

If I understand it right, YAC is calculated simplistically: literally, the yards after the receiver snatches the ball until he is downed, falls, runs out of bounds, or scores. Ad absurdum, then, any receiver having every catch on the 1/1000 yard line isn't going to look very good in YAC. Same true for any receiver to whom every pass is through high & outside just inside the sideline.

The astute reader will, by now, have noticed that any form of "absurdum" is sort of a personal strength.

I found the 2020 "every catch" video for Mr. Metcalf (https://www.nfl.com/videos/every-dk-metcalf-catch-2020-season) and watched it like...four times. (Mostly because I had this other thing I was trying to figure out & had hit a wall, so I needed a distraction. That didn't work, yet.) My thought was to look at every catch & ask myself "what could have been done different in order to keep going". In a lot of cases (but not all), I had to conclude that very little could have been done after the catch. Mr. Metcalf was "in traffic" a lot (with little separation), or along the sidelines, or ran out of field length.

I was struck by the number of times Mr. Metcalf had to break stride, effectively discarding separation in order to catch the ball. I did not count the number of times, or calculate any statistics, consult my Ouija board, cast bones, or glue my crystal ball back together (again). It was just "annecdotal" evidence. It sure seemed like slight differences in ball placement would have increased his YAC.

Even more interesting, however, was a "PFF Data Study" from 2021 (https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-pff-data-study-yards-after-the-catch-determined-factors-before-the-catch). Bearing in mind that I don't focus on Pro Football, so have no real clue whether PFF can be trusted...it was the type of data-intensive study that attracts my attention. More or less, the conclusion was (to paraphrase, simplify, and otherwise confuscate) that YAC resulted from how the receivers were being used.

I think that isn't very different from the conclusions Ken arrived at, except I might have phrased it more like "the 'Hawks didn't place their receivers very well for YAC" or "Ol' Geno didn't select his targets very well for YAC". The downside to that is (I think) that if they don't fix that problem (which is at least as much scheme as personnel), the shiny new toy might not help much.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts