Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike McD's avatar

Football in a way is a reflective sport between offense and defense. Meaning RBs are LBs, Guards/Centers are D Tackles, O Tackles are Edges, WR are cornerbacks etc.

Football is an ever changing sport which is one of the coolest parts about it. What worked in 1990 may have changed in 2025. With those changes the chess pieces change value.

1) Running backs have been devalued recently ... So what would we expect on the defense? Linebackers become less valuable (run stopping LBs). I think about LaDanian Tomlinson and Brian Urlacher but there are tons of examples. How many middle LBs get touted today? As always, there are some (Roquan Smith). But our really good LB (Jones) just signed for $10M Guaranteed $9.5M APY (very cheap relative to other positions).

2) Call it the Aaron Donald effect if you want. But we have seen a move towards valuable D Tackles as they have become a threat to attack the QB (Jalen Carter, we hope Byron Murphy/Leo). So what would we expect and JS missed? Guards become more valuable because they are the ones defending the attacking interior rushers. Most D Tackles back in the day were cloggers and run stoppers, that has changed.

And finally, this also goes with the article yesterday that I agree with, I would rather have a stout line than WRs. The reflective position to that is that I would rather save money at cornerback.

All these changes have their exceptions as the article points out, Top WR are still game changers and should be paid accordingly along with top cornerbacks. But, as the article points out, we could be seeing a move away from the average CB (and WR?) pay level in relativity to the rest of the players.

I don't see Woolen getting the extension and I am ok with that ... Just as I was ok with letting DK go.

Expand full comment
Chris H's avatar

Positional value is a thing. But I think looking at that exclusively, and not looking at the player would be a mistake. For 'force multipliers', as MacDonald calls them, you take them at any position. I don't care if Spoon is a CB, you pay him and keep him. I think Mike also talked about building your defense inside out, so DT's before DE's, LB's before DB's, Safeties before CB's. But, a player like Spoon you take regardless of position.

I agree fully that we likely won't pay Woolen AND Spoon......at least not what they're worth. Woolen already knows this, per his interview with Seattle Sports yesterday. He knows it's a big year for him, and he knows it could be his last in Seattle. He'll get paid, somewhere.

I'm too lazy to look at every team, but I'd put our current DB room (S's and CB's) up against anyone's. Can any other team do better than Love, Bryant, Emmanwori, Woolen, and Spoon? I can't think of any.

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts