Seahawks fan survey offseason edition: Keep Geno? Draft a QB? Make a trade?
The simple "Yes/No" answers to complicated questions: Seaside Joe 1434
Though the Internet gives the illusion of free content, the truth is that virtually nothing here is free. Except for Seaside Joe. And I really mean that. Elsewhere you are either paying a subscription fee, or worse, subjected to ads. What else besides this daily email about the Seahawks is truly free?
Twitter? An incredible amount of ads. Same for Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, etc.
Your favorite sports website, something.com. Ads, I’m sure. Over the air television? Ads. Watching a football game on a streaming site? Ads.
I personally prefer paying for content whenever I’m given the option. I use YouTube for hundreds of hours per month and I’m grateful for YouTube Premium so that I don’t have to wait through commercials. HBO Max, Netflix, Hulu, Crackle, Plex, FreeVee, Showtime, Amazon Prime, and so on. They can even put “Free” in the name of the streaming service and guaranteed you’re either paying for it or you’re getting ads.
Many people say they don’t mind ads, but in most instances advertisements take something from you that is much more valuable than money: Time. It’s just wasted time. Hey, I like a good commercial—a good commercial, which they don’t make anymore—and even then there’s only so many times I can watch Peyton Manning or Patrick Mahomes on my TV without them simply playing football.
Then, of course, there are the subscription websites like The Athletic or The Seattle Times or Substack newsletters like this one but in which the author doesn’t provide any free content. And I get that too; people should be paid for their work. I have my set of content creators who will always receive some form of payment from me every month because I want them to keep going and I know what they’re sacrificing to entertain or educate me.
But I like sending out a free Seahawks article every day because I believe in creating something new, something bigger and better than most of the content that is being made today. A football website 100% supported by the people who read it and a writer who isn’t beholden to higher powers at media conglomerates or advertisers in order to stay afloat because we all believe in creating the same thing together here at Seaside Joe.
And I know that the people reading this right now comprise the exact right community to pull off that miracle of eventually being bigger than the biggest: Browse any other Substack about football and you will struggle to find anyone close to our amount of engagement in comments, likes, and shares. Browse any other Substack about sports.
Browse any other Substack.
Nobody else is writing more than once a day, let alone once a day, let alone seven times a week, let alone 52 weeks a year. Let alone 10 years a decade? I think we can do it.
We already are doing something different here at Seaside Joe and I’m grateful for your support as a free or paid subscriber. It’s been nearly a year since we moved over to Substack full-time and the subscriber count has grown by over 1200%. It’s been almost four years since the newsletter started, meaning 1,434 straight days of sending out Seaside Joe, over 1,600 articles total with bonus content recently, and over 3 million words written here about the Seattle Seahawks.
For free. No ads. Go anywhere else and tell me where that’s true.
Oh yeah, Wikipedia. And Wikipedia is perhaps the most powerful and important thing on the Internet.
Or second most.


Thank you for doing your part—whether you are a day one subscriber or this is your day one—in motivating Seaside Joe to keep going and for us to be able to envision that today isn’t anywhere near the end of what we’re going to do together…1,434 days is only the beginning. I see thousands of Seahawks articles ahead.
As we get into another offseason together, our fourth at Seaside Joe without missing a beat and not taking these long hiatuses like others, consider helping support the mission even if it’s only for one month. You’ve already heard the “ah, $5 is a cup of coffee” analogy a million times for various products, but really, think of what $5 gets you in your own personal walk of life. We know that many coffee orders are pricier than that now.
A tip for a valet to park your car one time? One gallon of gas? Maybe sharing a beer at a bar with two other people?
I know that Seaside Joe is free and how unique that is to find on the Internet or for anything. No ads, no worthless 100-word intros to Substack or The Athletic articles before they hit the paywall, and thousands of work per year on this end to make something unlike anything else in this space. Consider that $5 for a month, $55 for a whole year, or $120 for the year if you’re fancy—to help keep us going as the only space in the Seahawks universe that is anything like Seaside Joe.
I’m blown away by the work you’ve done to help Seaside Joe reach this size already and I am grateful for your belief in what we’re doing here. I hope we can get the next 436 subscribers to hit 2,000 by the time the NFL Draft arrives and then 3,000 by the end of 2023. The Seahawks have 2.5 million followers on Twitter; just imagine if we managed to get one percent of them to subscribe to Seaside Joe?
That would really change the narrative of what we’re building here.
So please help spread the word about SeasideJoe.com. Tell Seahawks fans. Get someone a gift subscription, if you’d like and they’d like. Every day there’s a free newsletter that is 100-percent shareable on social media or over text/e-mail/DMs, etc. Often there is bonus content. I couldn’t commit this hard for four years if I didn’t love it.
Let’s see if we can grow it into something more than only a labor of love. It’s free to share!
Okay enough with the self-promotion and onto the survey!
I’ve run hundreds of fan surveys over the years because I’ve always thought it is very important to know what fans think. That will tell you at least as much as hearing what players and coaches and analysts think; definitely more than what most analysts think.
What have I said? The collective knowledge of the community is so much more than what I can ever know. And I never take that for granted.
In running so many surveys, I’ve seen the same reactions to certain questions over and over again. One such response is: “I needed a poll answer that wasn’t an option.”
That’s fair. There are only so many words you can write in a poll and only so many available spaces for possible answers. There are many nuances to the questions we often ask about football (or other topics) and understandably there will always be people who didn’t see the answer option that they needed to see.
However, I am going to press you to make difficult decisions in the following polls. Why? Two reasons:
I think it will reveal something important to know what you would say when you’re forced to make a difficult decision without all the nuance; oftentimes this is the same way that players, coaches, owners, and general managers must act when making decisions
It won’t kill you
These are just polls. Surveys. A feeling for what fans are feeling. There are no consequences and there is no wrong answer. There is no result that can be wrong. There is just the revelation of the answers. That’s it. Pete Carroll and John Schneider will not make decisions based on the outcome of these polls.
Not unless maybe you sign them up for Seaside Joe and get them a gift subscription or something. I’m not opposed.
I’m going to broach some of the big Seahawks topics of the moment and then we’ll talk about the poll results later in the week.
The Geno Smith decision
Let’s keep it as simple as possible. Geno is a free agent. You’ve read a lot about his pending free agency. You’ve seen the franchise tag number ($32 million) and you know that’s about as much money as Seattle has to spend in free agency right now, but they can always create more space.
You’ve also watched Geno Smith start 21 games in the last two years. Good feelings or bad, you have a sense of what he is at quarterback and what the alternatives are, as well as the cost. You know the Seahawks can’t keep Geno without some form of contract. Don’t overthink any answers here, just answer with your gut.
The QB Draft decision
The Seahawks hold the number five pick in the draft. Many draft experts say that Bryce Young, C.J. Stroud, and Will Levis are in competition to go in the top-five as quarterbacks. They also believe that Will Anderson and Jalen Carter are defensive linemen set to go in the top-five. We don’t know how close to reality all of these prognostications are, but we have a sense that if the Seahawks really want to draft a quarterback early, they will definitely have that option for somebody.
Your gut.
Cap Savings: Shelby Harris
The Seahawks may need to find room in the budget no matter what happens at quarterback. The team would save $8.94 million by releasing Harris, with $3.27 million left in dead money against the 2023 cap. Harris had two sacks, 44 tackles, five tackles for a loss in 15 games.
Trade: Jamal Adams
Adams, 28, has missed 26 games since the Seahawks traded two first round picks for him in 2020. Seattle will save no money by trading Adams, in fact it would cost them $3.2 million more against the cap to trade him. The trade return probably wouldn’t be a lot, maybe a fifth round pick. But some have grown impatient with waiting for Adams to have an impact and I’m sure there are those who believe the team would be better off handing the job to Ryan Neal for a full offseason, camp, preseason, and season. Adams may not even be ready for training camp as he recovers from a quad injury. Others still feel that Adams will be an instant upgrade to the defense when healthy.
Note: The Seahawks would save money by cutting or trading Adams after June 1, but I’m not sure how likely it is that a team would take him on at $11 million. A cut could be possible.
Draft picks 2, 3, 4: Best Player or Need?
Many fans have grown frustrated or are simply worried about certain positions such as center, guard, edge rusher, and defensive tackle. They would like Seattle to pick players in the draft based on these immediate needs rather than necessarily picking the absolute best prospect regardless of position.
An example might be picking a running back like Bijan Robinson as the BPA or to select a center at pick 20, even if he’s projected to go in the middle of day two. Think of what your gut might say if you had to choose between a position that doesn’t seem like a great need, such as RB or TE or S, vs. a need, but you know that the first prospect is simply better at football right now?
Setting aside pick 5, consider picks 20, 37, and 52: Should Seahawks fill their needs or go for the best player regardless of his position?
Let’s see how these five questions go and then circle back later in the week. And thanks again for your support, let’s keep getting the JOE to GROW!
No Quartback this year. All defense especially defense tackles. Big ones, Siaki Ika, Mazi Smith etc....
and the other thing....i dont see Hawks to have any position, that couldnt be upgraded at the draft....maybe OT, but even OT can move inside (for example i think Skoronski can be franchise guard)...
QB? Why not if there would be only Geno (and not sure)
RB? Why not - we need two-three headed monster like Patriots or Eagles have used
WR? Certainly - Lockett is aging and we dont have 3rd receiver
TE? Look at the contracts and in Waldron´s system we could use 4 TE´s per game regularly
C, G Obvious
T Like said above (can move inside)
---
DL, DE, OLB Obvious
LB Obvious
S Still have questions about Diggs, and what will bring Adams after these two injuries is also problem
CB Still would like 2nd player opposite of Woolen
And dont make me feel bad for that: WHAT IF rookies dont make another step forward? Sophomore slump is so ordinary...
SO THE ONLY RESULT IS: GO FOR BEST PLAYER AVAILABLE BECAUSE IT IS THE SAME LIKE POSITION NEED FOR A TEAM THAT NEEDS HELP EVERYWHERE :-)