Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charlie Swift's avatar

I think there’s a pattern to Seahawk drafting as relates to the top half of the first round. In the top half, the Seahawks, draft an elite college player. (Cross -9, Thomas - 12, and Okung -6). After that with their top picks, the Seahawks draft elite athletes like most recently Mafee and Metcalf or elite college players who are undervalued because of position, most recently Walker or physical attributes most famously Wilson but also Tate, Lockett, etc. or trade the pick for an established elite pro-player.

With that in mind, I cannot see the Seahawks going for Murphy at 5. (For the same reason I don’t see them going for Richardson or Levis). 20 is a swing pick because for most teams, including the Seahawks, between 16 and 20 is the point in the draft where all of the players with a first round grade are gone.

As a forced first round pick Murphy is a possibility (cannot trade down), but the Seahawks are essentially drafting Mafee again. Depending on the board it could happen but it just seems like there will be better options.

Expand full comment
Bob Johnston's avatar

Maybe it's just the time during the draft process where people like pointing out warts but I'm getting the impression that a lot of guys are overrated who are projected to go top 10. I saw this video on Anderson and Wilson and the reviewer was not impressed despite their physical attributes. I'm coming to the conclusion that we vastly overrate potential and we should be looking more and more at actual results and demonstrable skills.

This keeps bringing me back to Jalen Carter... I've seen a number of videos showing his quick getoff and ability to put together a variety of moves... moves that a lot of these other guys don't seem to have. I think at this point I'll actually be disappointed if the Hawks don't get Carter at 5.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZiAa2Cs3_w

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts