Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Doug's avatar

A coming out night for the D, for sure, even with the early Jamal exit. Defensive Rookie of the Year (and maybe Defensive Player of the Year) Witherspoon is a revelation and I will say it again that I did "see" his first INT coming this game! Witherspoon will become the "Kam" of this defence and maybe earlier than I thought.

On offense though, wow that was bad. I will give Geno a bit of a pass because of the injury but the execution was not there. I wonder how it all changes though if K9's first touchdown is allowed to stand? What a great play that was by K9 to maintain his balance, "butt cheek" notwithstanding (I still didn't see it on frame by frame replay). The referreeing was awful. Those holding calls--some of them were phantom calls. The broadcast did not do a replay of the Parkinson "hold" but he was pissed about it.

Lock came in cold and I thought still looked good. Uncharacteristic drops by JSN and Lockett and he still converted a 3rd and 10. His athleticism showed out on a run for a first down also. Lock led the longest scroing drive of the night, and it wasn't close.

If the Seahawks can ever get the offense rolling like the D was tonight, LOOK OUT.

Expand full comment
Mike McD's avatar

Vegas wasn't built by setting bad lines ... Make no mistake about it: The Giants opened as the (slight) favorites in this game. Yes, I think it was a bad line but you still got to respect what they are seeing. And what they are seeing is cluster injuries to the offensive line in Seattle against a good defensive line in Giants.

I'm not sure what Jake Curhan needs to do? He is 7-1 as a starter and is a mauler in run offense. The man is getting paid less than 1 million dollars a year. He just went up against on the road to Aiden Hutchinson (2nd overall pick!), Derrick Brown (7th overall pick) / Brian Burns (makes $16M a year), and on the road and for some reason the Hawks stuck him on an island against Kayvon Thibodeaux (5th overall pick). I would have to check but I think he has given up a total of 2 sacks. And those 2 sacks we don't know are on him or the running backs not chipping.

Also, the Giants made the playoffs last year. In no way shape or form did anyone in or around football think that the Giants were anywhere near the worst team in the league. That is what the Seahawks did to them last night.

In the NFL, there will always be weird games. That is the nature of the game. Refs affect outcomes of games. We are likely to go the rest of the year without another holding call on a run play - we had 3 (only 1 was legit on DK). We had a false start on a play that every center does every week on the snap. And we had a lineman down field by inches (unclear if that was Curhan's fault or just unlucky).

At the end of the day, all that matters is winning. Geno didn't necessarily play great and didn't necessarily play bad (no turnovers or even close) - but he did play well enough to win. Lock came in and did what needed to be down to win. Olu Olu did what needed to be down to win. All the Hawks did what it took to win, and win by a large margin. That is great to see. Not every game can and will be beautiful.

The things that I would like to see changed. I think it is time to move Charbs (or Dallas) above Ken for short yardage situations. The drive to start the second half was forced to a 4th down because K9 didn't pick it up in a relatively easy situation. Charbs/Dallas get that every time. And I don't want K9 to change, I like the home run hitter, just not at bat when you need a single. We know he has a low success rate.

Finishing drives is gonna be something Pete will undoubtedly talk about with Shane/Geno. They need to get on the same page with the lead in the 4th quarter. Thats twice now.

Overall, the doom and gloomers about the Seahawks have been proven wrong again. After week 1 they are now 3 -1, handled business with a backup line and will get healthier as the year goes on.

Awesome work! Go Hawks!

Expand full comment
70 more comments...

No posts