Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Danno's avatar

PFF’s offseason grade so far is in and both the niners and the Rams have higher grades than the Hawks. No surprise there.

PFF is wrong about the Seahawks more than they’re right. Last offseason they had the Hawks competing with the Cardinals for last place in the division and a below .500 team. The only reason they aren’t grading them more harshly is because they just won the SB, not because they brought back all but 5 players from that team and have a plan to replace those players who became too expensive to keep. The Rams and 49ers are going all in on this year. They’re getting older, while the Seahawks stay young. JS doesn’t just want to win the SB again this year, he’s looking to be a serious contender for several more years. This is a weak draft class where depth falls off fast after 100. He’s planning to address three of the needs left by losing key players to free agency with the three picks he has in the top 100 picks this year. Most likely at CB, EDGE and RB. Next year is being talked about as a generationally deep class, and the Hawks have 12 picks already. No team has more. This is by design. They’ll get 4 comp picks in rounds 4 and 5 as long as they don’t sign a free agent above a certain cost. That’s why there’s been no splashy signings despite having cap space. He plans on keeping JSN Spoon and possibly D Hall next year and cap space will be needed for them. Then there’s Darnold the following year. JS is planning to be what the Chiefs almost were. If my rating meant anything, I’d give them an “A”

Scott M's avatar

We might be in the golden age of Seahawks football and don't realize it yet. I love our trajectory. Hoping we stay healthy and can run it back. Riley Mills was such a small sample size it's easy to forget he could regress downward...but dang he looks pretty promising imo. Wish I could be a fly in the wall at HQ and hear those internal discussions around the draft.

55 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?