Discussion about this post

User's avatar
KHammarling's avatar

The "Best" is we draft a 10-year 8x Pro Bowler at #5, and #20, and #37 etc. The "Worst" is we draft someone who does their PCL on Day 1 of Camp and never recovers at #5, at #20 we pick someone who gets arrested for gun possesion, at #37 we find a man who punches Pete after losing the second pre-season game etc.

The "Likely" outcome is that PC/JS sit happily at #5 and just take what comes there way. For me there are two QBs, a RB, an Edge, a DT and two CBs worth of #5 - and i'll stretch to a third QB in their trust. So my "Best Likely" outcome is we sit, don't trade up or down from #5, and come away with a secure or rotational starter from all five Day One & Two picks (basically, do what we did last year just somehow even a little better). I don't really have a "Worst Likely" because PC/JS have done enough good work to earn my trust in whoever they pick, i'd just rather not trade up from #5 or #20.

I am most certainly not going to get angry or upset over the NFL Draft. I love the 'Hawks, love Football. But i'm sensible enough not tie my entire existence or wellbeing to it. Even in the "Worst" comes to pass, i'll still be a pasionate Seahawks fan, and I hope most 'Hawks fans feel the same (and smartly avoid the worst echo chambers of internet opinion).

Expand full comment
Mike McD's avatar

*Mike McD projects Levis in the second round

People who read this comments will know this by now ... but I just can’t figure out why people consider Levis a better prospect than lock?

Options A

Lock + top Dlineman available (Anderson/Wilson/Carter or whoever)

Option B

Levis on rookie contact which is more this year than Lock in cap hit but Levis would be cheaper in year 3 and 4 (and 5) potentially than Lock

Why would the Seahawks do that?

Do people consider Levis more talented than Lock? Why?

I would imagine JS/PC see it the same way (as me) but time will tell!

Expand full comment
82 more comments...

No posts